December 1, 2000

Yardstick competition; theory, design, and practice

CPB: Meer prikkels voor efficiëntie in non-profit-sectoren?

Press release
In sectoren waar directe concurrentie niet (of nog niet) wenselijk is, is het aantrekkelijk om aanbieders op een andere manier te prikkelen om efficiënt te opereren. Een methode hiervoor is maatstafconcurrentie, dat wil zeggen dat partijen afgerekend worden op basis van hun relatieve prestaties ten opzichte van andere, soortgelijke aanbieders.

We are sorry, unfortunately there is no English translation of this page.

A typical example is a set of regional monopolies. The regulator compares the performance of various agents and rewards or punishes agents on basis of their relative performance. Despite its conceptual simplicity, yardstick competition is hardly used in the Netherlands.

This study first analyses the theory of yardstick competition. We then formulate necessary conditions for it to be applicable, and classify the various types of yardstick competition. We proceed with a number of international examples of yardstick competition in health care, education and utilities. We end by claiming that there is a lot of scope for worthwhile applications of yardstick competition in the Netherlands, although further research is needed to fully substantiate that claim.

Authors

Marcel Canoy
Frank Hindriks
Ben Vollaard